-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.4k
Fix windows socket #6408
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Fix windows socket #6408
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev
Previous commit
Fix windows socket
- Loading branch information
commit d5fb695e5a7727b7fd7c7bfe9072decb06fbae89
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
rg -n --type rust '\.detach\s*\(' -B 3 -A 3Repository: RustPython/RustPython
Length of output: 508
🏁 Script executed:
rg -n 'fn detach' crates/stdlib/src/socket.rs -B 2 -A 5Repository: RustPython/RustPython
Length of output: 335
🏁 Script executed:
rg -n 'into_sock_fileno|close_inner' crates/stdlib/src/socket.rs -B 2 -A 5Repository: RustPython/RustPython
Length of output: 1943
🏁 Script executed:
rg -n 'fn fileno' crates/stdlib/src/socket.rs -B 2 -A 5Repository: RustPython/RustPython
Length of output: 315
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: RustPython/RustPython
Length of output: 1563
🏁 Script executed:
sed -n '2374,2385p' crates/stdlib/src/socket.rsRepository: RustPython/RustPython
Length of output: 333
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: RustPython/RustPython
Length of output: 171
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: RustPython/RustPython
Length of output: 47
Verify the return type change impact across the codebase.
The
detach()method now returnsi64instead ofRawSocket. This is a breaking API change affecting:close()method (line 1463), which has been properly updated to handlei64and cast back toRawSocketforclose_inner()detach(), which receivesi64(Python'sintsafely represents this range)On Windows, casting
RawSocket(which isusize) toi64can theoretically overflow if a socket handle exceedsi64::MAX. This same issue also affects thefileno()method (line 1482), suggesting it may be an accepted limitation of the current design. Consider documenting whether this is a known limitation or requires a fix.