Replies: 1 comment
-
|
I'm curious too! We're considering Python.NET for an internal project but lack of support for PEP 779 is a deal breaker. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I’m wondering if there’s any ongoing discussion or future plan to support PEP 779 – Standardizing the C-API for Static Python Interpreters in Python.NET.
https://peps.python.org/pep-0779/
Since PEP 779 introduces changes and standardization around the use of Python’s C-API for static and embedded interpreter scenarios, it may have implications for how Python.NET interfaces with the runtime, especially in embedded or ahead-of-time compilation environments.
Some points for consideration:
I understand that PEP 779 is still in progress, but early evaluation might help ensure future compatibility and performance, especially thread safety issues.
Thanks for your work on this great project!
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions